.

Sequestration Could Cut $450K From CB Budget

Central Bucks School District officials are waiting to see how the threat of $85 billion in federal cuts will impact local schools.

Central Bucks schools could lose as much as $450,000 in federal funding if Congress doesn't reach a budget compromise.

That's the threat looming over schools here and across Pennsylvania and the country, as the days slip by before Friday's sequestration deadline.

Sequestration refers to $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts due to go into effect over the next 10 years. About $85 billion of those cuts would go into effect Friday unless Congress reaches a budget agreement.

In the meantime, school finance officials like Dave Matyas are playing the wait-and-see game.

"It’s like a black box. You know there will be budget cuts coming out of it but you don’t know what specific cuts there might be, and you don’t know how that’s going to impact Central Bucks," Matyas told Patch on Tuesday. He is Central Bucks' finance director.

Without action from Congress, sequestration would go into effect automatically on March 1, reducing spending by the state in a number of areas, including education, the environment, health, military and law enforcement. The cuts would be across the board, with no departmental input into how they would be implemented.

Pennsylvania could lose nearly $47.8 million in funding for regular and special education if Congress fails to halt the sequestration, according to figures released by the White House. 

For Central Bucks, it could mean as much as a 5 or 10 percent reduction in federal money coming into the district.

Central Bucks gets about $4.5 million in federal funding now, Matyas said. That accounts for only about 1.5 percent of the district's $288 million budget.

Still, a 10 percent cut would mean a loss of about $450,000, real dollars that would no longer be available. And that would hurt, Matyas said.

"The thing we spend the most money on is reading, to try to get students who are reading below grade level up to grade level," he said. "It’s an important program, and federal money helps pay for material and staff time for that.

"So the question then becomes, are we going to cut back on those federal programs or move money around to try to pay for them? So it’s worrisome."

Central Bucks Superintendent Dr. Rodney Green said Tuesday night that the district will wait and see what happens in the next few days before it begins taking the possibility too seriously.

"You would hope that smart people could sit down and figure this out," Green said.

If the cuts do go into effect, Matyas said they wouldn't hit Central Bucks until the 2013 - 2014 school year.

karen poloniewicz February 28, 2013 at 01:46 AM
It is actually only 0.15% of the total budget. About 1 tenth of 1%. An easy mathematical error, otherwise I completely agree with you.
bill murphy February 28, 2013 at 03:26 AM
I had to cut 2% from my budget this year every government agency should have to do the same.
Jane February 28, 2013 at 03:28 AM
They should do more, even.
Dina February 28, 2013 at 04:47 AM
The bias on these boards sounds as if your right wing political rally decided to whine whine whine. You want high property values? Pay your teachers and expect high academic successes. Quit whining and invest in the academic future if America.
Ed Vorwerk March 01, 2013 at 02:04 PM
I am an Independent and appreciate the various points of views. So I am not sure why "bias" anxiety surfaces when differences of opinion are communicated. Everybody will have their own point of view. There is plenty of corruption, bias, greed and stupidity with both Parties. However, I do believe the journalist, Sarah Larson, did not embody the spirit of fair and balanced reporting. Seems journalists today are interested in shock headlines rather than communicating a comprehensive set of facts with sources. It would have improved the story if she had put the facts into relative terms and into context of other facts. For example, the Federal government is slowing down the growth of spending year on year. They will still be spending more monies in 2013 than in 2012. This does not sound like a "cut" in terms of most people's personal budgets. Don't get me wrong. There will be consequences to a slow down in spending but a journalist should not only communicate the consequences of a slow down in spending at the Federal, State and Local level but also clealy communicate the relativity of this slow down in spending and the dire financial state of this great country. Shame on you, Sarah Larson. Let's get back to being a proper journalist.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »