.

Alliance and Compliance

Congressman Fitzpatrick has an interesting week in the House. Watch and learn.

Alliance and Compliance

Rep. Fitzpatrick (R-8) voted for the “cliff compromise”, eventually.   Citizens got no clue ahead of time from Mr. Fitzpatrick. Our neighboring Congressman, Charlie Dent (R-15), stated early that he intended to support compromise.  According to him it was the right thing to do, for his district and for the country.  “It will not be perfect, not ideal. It will require participation from both parties,” he said. “These are basic facts. We are going to have to put shoulder to wheel and deal with these issues.” With that news, those that were afraid for our immediate economic future could relax a little.  Mr. Fitzpatrick, however, let us dangle in the wind while he “thought about what would be best for all Americans”.  Translation:  Mustn’t raise taxes on the rich alone.  Everybody should share the burden.

On the day that the compromise package vote was being debated, we finally heard from Mr. Fitzpatrick on CSpan.  But he had nothing to say about the specifics of the fiscal compromise.  He used his air time to announce a new bill countermanding President Obama’s Executive Order allowing a very small salary increase (.5%) for legislators, judges, and other high level government employees.  His co-sponsor was Congressman Issa of California.  Fine.  But during a crisis that threatened to throw us into another recession he asks the House to debate and vote on a drop-in-the-bucket bill because it will make a few Congressmen look prudent?  It had to be right there, right then?

The alliance with Congressman Issa may be an important clue to Mr. Fitzpatrick’s future legislative moves.  Issa is blatantly rich.  He made millions in real estate deals, construction, and consulting, a fair percentage of it rake-offs from government programs.  Issa is expediently conservative.  He has no problem taking “hand-outs” that benefit his bottom line.  And Issa is a flagrant publicity seeker.  To repeat:  Issa is blatantly wealthy, expediently conservative, and a flagrant publicity hound.  Wow. 

This is the legislative collegiality that Congressman Fitzpatrick appreciates?  Hand in hand they sponsored a largely symbolic bill.  Mr. Fitzpatrick pointed out that it was patriotic for congressmen not to take a raise during tough times.  Actually, we agree.  They already make huge salaries, have dandy staff support (the lowly staff did not participate in the raise, however) and can use tax supported franking privileges to tell us all the good they are doing for us. When they are doing anything at all.

At about the same time, the House voted for the 34th time to repeal Obamacare!  Rep. Fitzpatrick and every single other Republican voted to repeal.  Yet the House deferred immediate action on most of the Sandy recovery request, claiming that they were too busy to give the bill its needed “close reading”.  The House saw no “emergency”.  Governor Christie (R-New Jersey) chose to disagree with the House priorities and publicly called the Republican leadership to task in no uncertain terms.  Collaboration with Governor Christie would have generated significant non-partisan appreciation across several states.  But Mr. Fitzpatrick followed the Leader and chose otherwise.

Remember all this the next time the House threatens to shut the government down because they need more time to act “carefully” and don’t want to “kick the can down the road”.  The house seems to have plenty of time for nonsense that meets certain partisan requirements.

Readers should carefully note the lack of attention to the fiscal cliff compromise, the timing of the small potatoes Issa-Fitzpatrick bill, the silly vote to repeal Obamacare, and the deferred attention to the needs of New York and New Jersey.  File this information with the claim that Rep. Fitzpatrick is one of the most independent members of the House.   Compliant yes. Independent?  Not really.

 

Ann Melby Shenkle

January 7, 2013

 

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

David Neamand January 09, 2013 at 05:14 PM
Ann I do not believe anything the congressman does or says would suite you. Your negativity is indicative of a cancer in our society. With most legislatures there may not be all bad or all good but some. With some since they are of a different viewpoint NOTHING they do is acceptable. That prevents compromise, and the "my way or the highway" attitude has created a schism in this country that widens with every negative posting. I applaud Congressman Fitzpatrick for waiting till he saw the bill to decide if he was going to vote on it. I wish he had voted against it on the basis of the pork included in the bill, but understand the necessity of his yes vote. As to his bill to freeze salaries, I totally agree with him. It may be small but costs must be cut and a small start is a start never the less.
Ann Melby Shenkle January 09, 2013 at 08:20 PM
Dear Mr. Neamand, Thank you for your long response! Usually this indicates careful reading and that makes a retired professor happy. But do try to distinguish “dislike” from “unhappy with performance”. As for “a cancer on society”? Yikes! Stubbornly requiring that those who represent me demonstrate the ability to negotiate fairly and to form appropriate alliances to get things done is inherited from my grandfather, who was a founder of the Non-Partisan League in the first legislature of the State of North Dakota. North Dakota works, then and now. And is about the size of the 8th District. We can do better.
Fed Up Taxpayer! January 10, 2013 at 11:18 PM
Being a "retired professor" says it all! Your opinions and I mean opinions are so slanted to the left that you have no credibility to report on anything. I like reading facts without personal slant being forced on the reader. Also, I abhor condescending responses like yours to Mr. Neamond. "Try to distinguish between dislike and unhappy with performance", really? I guess we can't all be as intelligent as a 'Retired Professor". I for one am happy that you are no longer in the indoctrination industry that poses as education in this country!
Randy Macon January 12, 2013 at 01:15 PM
I find it unusual and disturbing when an opinion that is based on observation and analysis draws ire as automatically being liberal or elitist. Ms Shenkle has carefully reviewed Mr Fitzpatrick's activities and gives her opinion. If you disagree, review the same set of activities and offer your own opinion. If we could skip the name calling and automatic dismissal of opinions one disagrees with, we would have a better dialogue.
Len Franckowiak February 09, 2013 at 06:08 PM
Ann, Have you ever considered changing your spots? Or, is that for the other guy to do? Len Franckowiak
Ann Melby Shenkle February 09, 2013 at 07:20 PM
Thanks Len, you are reading my mind! Check out my column in the February 7 Bucks County Herald, "Thinking Out Loud". Change is possible for anybody!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something