patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Middle School Schedule Change Provokes Strong Reactions

The Central Bucks School District superintendent and head of the teachers' union weigh in on what the changes mean for students and staff.

 

When the last round of PSSA scores came out, Dr. Robert Laws gave his administrators a task.

“I said, ‘Find the districts that scored better than us, and tell me why,’ ” the Central Bucks School District superintendent said Wednesday.

Not many districts scored higher than Central Bucks, one of the top-performing districts in the state. In those that did, though, Laws said, the difference was clear.

“The districts that out-performed us have longer middle-school periods than we do,” Laws told DoylestownPatch. “Hatboro Horsham has 90-minute middle school classes, and they scored better than us in math.”

Central Bucks already had been discussing the idea of lengthening the time middle school students spend in class, Laws said. The district made the change official at last week’s school board meeting.

Starting in the fall, CB middle school students will take six classes instead of seven, and each class will last 56 minutes rather than the current 46 minutes, Dr. Nancy Silvious said. She is the district’s assistant superintendent for secondary education.

The changes follow similar changes made about 15 years ago at the high school level, when the number of classes was reduced so the classes themselves could be lengthened. The move has proven resoundingly successful, Laws said.

“One of the international criticisms of the U.S. curriculum is that it’s a mile wide and an inch deep,” Laws said Wednesday. “Our block scheduling has shown that when we are able to do things in depth, our students benefit. SAT scores have risen every year since the beginning of block scheduling. And feedback from teachers and students is overwhelmingly positive.”

The teachers' union, though, is watching the move warily.

Keith Sinn, a science teacher at CB East and head of the district’s teachers’ union, said the new schedule likely will reduce demand for certain classes, thereby leading to layoffs.

“Obviously, we’re very concerned about the loss of talented teachers and the changes in the program and the opportunities offered to our students,” Sinn said Wednesday.

 

Implications for Art and Music

 

When the new schedule was announced last week, parents and the community immediately had questions. What would this mean for electives, like art and music? Some wondered if it was the first step toward eliminating those programs.

Silvious, though, said the new schedule actually allows students to take more art or music, if they want.

Under the current system, all middle school students are cycled through special subjects, Silvious said. Each quarter, they must take a different special subject, including art, music, physical education and health, computer applications, tech ed (industrial arts) and family and consumer science (home economics).

Now, the subjects truly will be elective, the administrators said.

“Music is a winner in this plan, a big winner,” Laws said. “Let’s say I’m in 8th grade. In today’s schedule, I was forced to take a quarter of family and consumer science. Now, I can take another quarter of music. I can focus on the area I want. It’s all about choice. If you want to declare yourself in art, you can take more art, or more family and consumer science if you want to be Paula Deen.”

But Sinn argued that narrowing a child’s focus too early restricts his opportunity to explore subjects he doesn’t even know that he likes yet.

“I have a daughter in middle school at Lenape, so this isn’t theoretical to me,” Sinn said.

“Sixth graders are going to have to decide, do I want to focus on art, or do I want to focus on music?" he said. "It’s early specialization at an age where you should have them exploring their interests and talents. I think that that’s a concern.”

Others shared that concern.

“Cutting down on electives doesn't improve education,” one woman wrote on our Facebook page. “It just narrows it.”

 

Does This Mean Layoffs?

 

Teachers had questions about the new schedule, too. Fewer classes might mean fewer teachers. Were some of them going to lose their jobs?

Laws said Wednesday that the district is eliminating only one course offering – computer applications.

The subject has become redundant in a district where elementary students learn to use PowerPoint and do word processing, Laws said. Skills previously taught in computer applications will be folded into other classes, he said.

The seven or eight teachers who teach computer applications will be reassigned, based on seniority, to other subjects, Laws said. Some may be furloughed – laid off, with the possibility of being recalled if a position opens up.

The superintendent denied that cost savings was the main impetus for the schedule change.

“There’s been a lot of talk that this was done for economic reasons. I can assure you this was not the reason,” Laws said. “Although, everything we do today, we look at from an economic perspective. Why do we do that? Because every year, I’m looking at making up $10 million just to get to the base point.”

Besides the computer applications teachers, Sinn said it is unclear which other special subject teachers might be let go. They won’t have a better idea of that until kids start requesting classes this spring.

“Teachers are notified, usually later in the spring, what their teaching assignments will be,” Sinn said. “But if we’re going from five major (classes) and two specials to five majors and one special, I would imagine that will create a reduction in staff.”

 

Protecting the Core

 

As the amount of revenue coming in to the district in recent years has fallen, Central Bucks administrators and board members have started talking about “protecting the core” -  focusing on main academic subjects such as math, English and science.

Everything else seems to be on the table.

In January 2011, the school board cut German from the middle school level.

Volunteers have formed the Central Bucks Sports Commission to study ways to keep funding sports fields, facilities and programs.

And while this latest scheduling move doesn’t eliminate electives, that possibility may still loom ahead. Just listen to Laws’ words.

“There is no concentrated effort to get rid of the specialists at this point in time. We value the specialists; we want to keep them,” Laws told DoylestownPatch. “Will Pennsylvania end up like California, with no music or art classes? I don’t know. That’s a question for the governor.

“But I can tell you if the resources continue to decline, choices will have to be made,” Laws continued. “We know our kids can get private music lessons, or private art lessons. But very few places are teaching them calculus.”

 

Teaching to the Test?

 

In her presentation last week to the school board, Silvious noted that focusing on core academic subjects will better prepare Central Bucks middle schoolers for the Keystone Exams, new state-mandated tests that will be part of the graduation requirement in coming years.

Readers of DoylestownPatch bristled at the notion that CB was eschewing the arts to focus on a standardized test.

“Teaching to testing mandates produces many more problems and does not produce a more intelligent student,” wrote one reader.

“Why do we always have to put test results before education?” asked another.

Laws said district administrators have been hearing the same criticisms all week. But they miss the point, he said.

“Too many people are saying it’s all about the test. It’s not. But this is a business also,” Laws said. “Don’t tell me don’t worry about the test. Because that’s how schools in Pennsylvania are measured. I didn’t decide that, the state did.

“If Central Bucks has low test scores, what do you think is going to happen to quality of life around here?” he continued. “There’s not a person walking through Doylestown that says, ‘Don’t worry about the tests; lower those test scores and lower my property values.’"

The district has put together sample schedules showing what the course load would look like for students under the new scheduling program. We have uploaded the information here, but the documents also can be viewed on the district's website.

Related Topics: Central Bucks School District, Central Bucks middle schools, and teacher layoffs

EJ

8:34 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

It is time we start teaching to learn, not teaching to test. We must, as a community, understand that a mile wide and 1 inch deep is where our 7th & 8th Graders need to be. It is by far better to let them experience as much as possible to help them develop. Saying we want better test scores is great, but it must be balanced.

Reply

Concerned CB Parent

8:59 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

There is no mention here about the gifted program, PEN. That is being cut as well! Dr. Laws quoted in another article that keyboarding skills are already taught in Elementary? NOT TRUE! How efficient will the student be when they are using their computer keyboard if they are not properly taught to keyboard in the most efficent manner!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sarah Larson

2:12 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

I talked to the district again today, and they say that no changes are planned for PEN, the gifted program, at any level, including middle school.

Comment_arrow

Kwin

4:30 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012

I don't think PEN is cut, but in 7th grade PEN is currently part of English or Reading class. Next year it will be an elective in specials, which further reduces choices in electives just for PEN kids. And that is on top of the already diminished electives. Currently, PEN kids get 8 specials classes. Next year they will get 3 specials, plus PEN. All other kids get to choose 4 specials.

Nadia

10:04 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

As a CB school taxpayer...I would rather see them add an additional class, not take away. Our school teachers get excellent salaries & benefits...it would be fair to ask them and the students to spend a bit more time in school with a variety of subjects. The school board should look closer at their teaching method. Are the teachers and students interactive with the subjects? Just stressing grades does not work.

Reply

Tina Magura

11:35 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Dr. Laws needs to learn more about current middle school scheduling. MUSIC DOES NOT WIN UNDER THE NEW SCHEDULING PLAN! Currently, a student would take orchestra/band/chorus every other day for the ENTIRE YEAR, alternating with PE. The period in which the changing electives were scheduled is the period that has been deleted. Under the new plan, a student will only be able to take 2 or 3 quarters of music, with the addtional quarter(s) used for PE. This means that A MUSIC STUDENT MAY GO 8 MONTHS WITHOUT INSTRUCTION OR PRACTICE. How can you create a cohesive music program with 8 months of no contact? This plan eliminates any form of an effective music program, and will cause it's obsolescence as students, parents, and teachers are frustrated with a lack of progress.

Reply

Rachel

12:18 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Since when do we want 7th, 8th and 9th graders to become specialists? And really, do we want to encourage students to choose to emulate Paula Deen??? Really, Dr. Laws, PAULA DEEN???? I would rather see students be able to take music AND art instead of one or the other. And the music program will suffer tremendously under these new guidelines. Moreover, because my daughter is still required to fulfill a PE course in high school, she can only take 3 MP's of band and one of PE so she doesn't have to double up later in PE. That is it - the full extent of her "electives" is taken up b/c she wants to continue with band. No room for art or photography or chorus etc. This is just not a good solution for anyone who is interested in exposing their children to a wide range of courses, not because they want to become professionals or "specialists", but because these classes are fun and engaging and use a different part of their brain and expose them to a bigger world than core academic performance! I AM DISGUSTED with this inability to see the responsibility of public education is to expand the world for our children, not shrink it!

Reply

Mary191

1:33 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Students spending more time in "core subjects" is always a good idea. In case anyone hasn't noticed ..... jobs are disappearing from the USA and going to countries who teach more "core subjects" when they educate their kids.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bill Barber

11:08 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Mary... do you plan on having the same robot being produced with this model? What happens to the artists, musicians, tech students, who do not fit into this mold? How about the obese child? When is health being taught? Wake up!

Comment_arrow

Mother of 3 in CB

6:48 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Mary, not always true. Low wages and the stock market along with corporate greed is driving jobs away from the USA. China is now having to pay their workers more as they industrialize more and more. There won't be "cheap" labor forever. I'm not sure jobs leave this country because they spend more time on core subjects. It's time for unions and administrators and elected officials to come to the table, have a longer school day and not 3 months off a year. Fund education the way it should be funded, there's a way to do if greed and power would step aside on all sides!

Jeff Lugar

1:52 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Why is everyone bashing the district and Dr. Laws? They and he did not create the need for this; the state did, as Dr. Laws is quoted as mentioning in the article. If you're given one measuring stick to measure performance, and it only measures one thing, you're going to do what you can to focus on the one thing being measured. The state doesn't care about any thing else, and the district is just repsponding to that.
If you want things to change, write letters to people higher up whose decisions are causing districts to make these changes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CBMom3

7:57 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Jeff, this has nothing to do with the state and is purely an independent and misguided proposal offered by Dr. Laws. He came up with this one on his own! Unfortunately, our board lacks the independence to EVER vote against Dr. Laws. As a result, we have a school district has little regard for the taxpayers and parents that support it.

Comment_arrow

Bill Barber

11:10 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Jeff, Actually the Keystone exams have been pushed back because of lack of funding. No school will be required to take them next year. Check your facts before you go blindly following the other lemmings.

SVT

6:58 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012

CBMOM, I wish the situation was just affecting one district, but it is a discussion happening everywhere. I have kids in CB and teach in a nearby district that is going through some major changes and teaching positions are at stake there too. The state determines much of it and sadly I think the economy allows for only so many options.
I know I don't have the right answer to making this work, do you?
Dr. Laws will never please everyone all the time!

Reply

cbmom3

9:55 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

SVT, the state doesn't determine any of this. CBSD does. And, if you are a teacher, you should know that they can't lay you off because of the economy in PA. Flawed or not, that is PA law. Dr. Laws has denied, and must deny to the bitter end that this is not an economic decision but a curriculum decision. So, if that is the case, why do we need to find a way to make this plan work when our test scores are about as high as possible?

Reply

Gary

11:11 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Dr. Laws asked his administrators to "Find the districts that scored better than us, and tell me why,” I hope - really hope - that this has been oversimplified. There are far too many variables at these other schools - the schools that performed better on tests - to use the findings to make any kind of accurate decisions as to what actually led to the higher test scores. It's an extremely difficult if not near impossible task to ask of the best research analysts. I would love to see the results of the research. Are we privy to this info? And, Jeff, come on, we can’t give Dr. Laws a free pass. He's representing the district in all matters education and would be in a better position to air his grievances with the state than the parents within that district.

Reply

Robert Burns

8:54 pm on Tuesday, March 20, 2012

It is all about the test scores. CB middle schools are telling our children they have to do better on the PSSA tests. Why because the state requires a certain percentage score proficiently on the test. The state is requiring special education students also take the test. So in order to keep funding in the district all children are being pressured to better than the last time they took the test. In order to do this the middle school pricipals were asked by Dr. Laws to find a way to get better scores. Their answer was more class time in the core subjects.
Ninth graders are going to receive one less credit in the electives for meeting the graduation requirements due to these changes. They also will only be able to choose 1 elective because PE/Health is also a graduation requirement for high school. For more information go to http://www.centralbucksengage.com/ tax payers against these changes to our school district and come out to the 3/27/12 school board meeting at 7:30 pm, venue has not yet been determined.

Reply

Leave a comment